Heterogram
A heterogram is a logogram whose belonging to a foreign writing system remains synchronically transparent and functionally relevant in the text: the scribe deliberately employs signs from another language as such, not as elements absorbed into the current system. The distinction from a logogram is therefore not diachronic (foreign origin) but synchronic (perceived and codified otherness).
The paradigmatic case is that of Aramaic heterograms in epigraphic Middle Persian, where sequences such as MLKʾ are written in Aramaic but read in Middle Persian (šāh, “king”).
Overview
| Notation | Conceptual AST | Paper Output |
|---|---|---|
&𝑆×𝑁;fₛ=fₕ;…& | `LexicalUnit([𝘜], LinguisticAnalysis[ | |
| fₖ:fₕ,…])` | 𝑆×𝑁 |
𝑆= any sign (Unicode character) ∉STOP_SET(cf. Technical Catalogue of Symbols) otherwise preceded by the escape character\.𝑁= number of characters (represented by char or digits).fₛ∈["gf", "graphic", "function"]= label for the graphic function.fₕ∈["ht", "heterogram"]= value of the graphic function indicating a heterogram.fₖ= canonical key for the graphic function derived from the corresponding label.
Syntax
Syntax
Any number of Unicode characters constituting the logogram followed by a semicolon ; (representing any sequence of IbiUnit variants), followed by one of the keys indicating the graphic function (graphic, function or gf), an equal sign = and the value ht (or heterogram); all enclosed within ampersands &…&.
Examples
| Notation | Paper Output |
|---|---|
|
MLKʾ𐭬𐭫𐭪𐭠MLKʾšāhhg
|
|
ŠNT𐭔𐭍𐭕ŠNTsālhg
|
|
'YŠH𐼰𐼷𐽁𐼳'YŠHzanhg
|
EpiDoc Outputs
| Notation | EpiDoc (XML) |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structural Analysis (Conceptual AST)
| Notation | AST |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|